Edrm xml validation tool

The default for Delimiters is Concordance Default. Selected Fields — Currently there are over fields available for inclusion in the load file.

To add a field to the load file, select one or multiple fields in the Available Fields table or filter the heading of the Document Type column to select all the fields of the specified type and click the Add Selected Fields button. This will add the Selected Fields to the load file. Checking Select All above the Available Fields table and clicking Add Selected Fields will export all available fields if that is desired.

A field can be used more than once in the load file. You may optionally drag a selected column header to the space at the top of the Selected Fields table to group output by that column Field Type , Data Type or Document Type. To see a complete listing of these fields as well as a description of the field please see Appendix D.

This will move the unwanted fields back into the Available Fields section. These fields will be exported in the order in which they appear. To move the order of the field s around, select the field s and use the to move the field s up and down in order.

This value will be set to what is believed to be the correct corresponding EDRM data type for the Discovery Manger export field. Add Combined Field — There are two types of combined fields that can be created at export time: Combined Fields and Concatenated Fields. Combine Fields — This combined field is a custom field that will be populated at export time with the first non-blank value for the selected fields.

Enter a new Field Name. Click the Add Selected Fields button. To remove any of these fields select the field s and click the Remove Selected Fields button. To rearrange the order of the fields which will determine the order in which each is tested for a value to include in the exported combined field select a field and use the key to move the field up and down in order.

When the Selected Fields are in the correct order, click the Save Field button and the combined field will be saved. Concatenate Fields — This combined field is a custom field that will be populated at export time by combining the values of the fields selected, set off with a specified delimiter.

Change the Behavior drop-down to Concatenate Fields. Provide the Field Name. Provide the Delimiter that will be used between the fields. Select one or multiple fields and click the Add Selected Fields button. To rearrange the order of the fields which will determine the order of values set out in the resulting concatenated field select a fields and use the buttons to move the fields up and down in order. When the Selected Fields are in the correct order, click the Save Field button, and the concatenated field will be saved.

Image Branding — To brand an image the following settings are available:. Branding Font — To choose the font or font size, click on the default Arial and change the settings. Branding Font Style — By default, all brands applied to images will be in bold font. To change this, click the Bold drop-down and select either Regular or Italic.

Image Numbering -- To set the numbering for image pages you may configure the following options:. Prefix -- You may specify a Custom prefix by typing the preferred alphanumeric text in the Custom space; it will appear in the Example below. Padding Length -- Set the length of the numbering with leading zeros; the default is 8. Start Number -- A running export may require a number other than the default 1.

Endorsements — To use a Selective Set as the scope of files to receive an Endorsement, click Add Endorsement , choose the desired set as the Endorsement Scope and add the Endorsement Text. Multiple Endorsements for files are supported. If a file is contained within more than 1 Endorsement, the Endorsements will appear in the order they appear in the Endorsements Table from top to bottom in the image.

Placeholders — A placeholder substitutes a formatted image for a file in an Export or a Production where either an image could not be created during imaging or where certain content needs to be removed and replaced with a generic record. Typical use cases are where an excessively large and complete spreadsheet fails imaging, or where there are privileged files within a Production which need to be withheld.

There are five settings to choose from when adding Placeholders to an Export or a Production. Placeholder Scope — To choose a scope of documents to replace with a Placeholder, click into the selection box and choose one of the following two options from the table:.

Once enabled, File Types can be selected to be treated as Placeholders. A use case for this is treating Excel and PowerPoint files as Placeholders and produce the files in their native format. Type Imaging Status — This setting will isolate all imaging errors within the selected Export scope. Native Behavior —By default, native files will export for the Placeholder files.

To disable this so that native files are not exported for the Placeholders, click Export Natives and choose Suppress Natives. This will only export a text file for all Placeholder files with the verbiage provided in Placeholder Text.

Placeholder Text — This text will appear in the center of the image placeholder and will be the only text provided in the Text Placeholder, if the Text Behavior is set to the option Export Placeholder Text. Metadata Fields — An image Placeholder can have metadata applied to the image to provide more information about the file. To apply one or more metadata values to the image placeholder, click the checkbox next to the metadata value.

The metadata values will appear in the order they are selected. To find information regarding the metadata field values, please see Appendix D. If the Export is of the type Production and the Production has files that were added to the Privileged Tag Group, the Placeholder for this Privileged Tag Group will appear in the table as the first Placeholder.

There are several fields and Placeholder management functions within this table. If this is selected, the entire family will be withheld from the Production and treated as a Placeholder.

Placeholder Text — The text of the image and text if applicable placeholder. Placeholder Table Management — There are 3 different management options available for the Placeholder Table:. View Placeholder — To view how the Placeholder will look at export time, click the for the item in the table, and click the button.

Delete Placeholder — To delete the Placeholder, click the for the item in the table, and click the button. Order Placeholder — The order of Placeholders matter. If a file is contained in more than 1 Placeholder, the file will receive the settings from the topmost most Placeholder the file is contained in. To move the order of the Placeholders around, click the for the item in the table, and click the buttons to move the Placeholder to the proper order.

If available in a Production Export, a Privilege Tag Group Placeholder will always receive the topmost position in the Placeholder Table, and cannot be moved from this position. Depending on the export or production criteria, it may be necessary to control this folder structure.

The Volume and Folder Options allow users to control this. Volume Options — Volume is another word for the Export's top level or parent folder that contains data underneath it. The following settings are available for the Volume Options:. It will remain constant and appear on each Volume. By default, this is set to 3 characters.

Start Number — The initial number applied to the first Volume in the export set. Example — The example of how the labeling as configured will look on the first Volume in the export set. Size Per Volume — This is the maximum amount of data that can go into a Volume. When a Volume reaches this maximum size, a new Volume is created, incrementing the Start Number by 1.

The following Folder Options control how these folders are created and populated for a given Volume:. Add Fields — Currently there are a total of 3 fields to choose from for the Folder Options, which are detailed below. Each time a field is selected and added, a new folder will be created at export time underneath each Volume with that information, in the order in which the fields appear in the Selected Fields table.

To add a field, select one or multiple fields from the left-hand Available Fields box and click the Add Fields button. Remove Fields — The right-hand box contains the Selected Fields for folders that will be created within the Volume.

These fields will be generated on export in the order they appear. To change the order of the fields select any fields and use the to move the fields up or down in order. To remove any of these fields select the field s and click the Remove Fields button.

By default, this is set to 1. By default, this is set to per folder. Families will not be broken in these settings. The Total Documents in the Export Summary will always be less than first expected as email will be exported back into its native format meaning attachments will not be broken out as separate files. In a Natives Only Export the value for attachments will always be 0 as seen below. Clicking Refresh while configuring an Export will clear all settings.

Successfully reported this slideshow. We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Next SlideShares. You are reading a preview. Create your free account to continue reading. Sign Up. Upcoming SlideShare. Franchise Recruitment Summit July Embed Size px. Start on. Show related SlideShares at end. WordPress Shortcode. Share Email. Top clipped slide. Download Now Download Download to read offline.

Key Issues in eDiscovery Sep. Business Technology. Osterman Research, Inc. EDiscovery Presentation. E-Discovery explained, so you don't need to be a Lawyer, to get it. FreEed - Open Source eDiscovery. January Document Scanning Considerations Presentation. Ediscovery Related Books Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd.

Related Audiobooks Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd. Elizabeth Howell. Key Issues in eDiscovery 1. Its importance can be summed up by the Zubulake standard: "[A] party has a duty to preserve all evidence, including electronically stored information 'ESI' , that it knows, or should know, is relevant to any present or future litigation.

While the formal process of discovery has been a key element of civil litigation for decades, eDiscovery has become much more important over the past years as the proportion of electronic content in most organizations has become more voluminous and more difficult to manage than information on paper. As evidenced by the following figure, businesses and other organizations believe that eDiscovery will remain just as important over the next 12 months as it is today, or it will become Poor eDiscovery more important.

Moreover, IBM estimates that each day 2. While much of this data is normally not subject to eDiscovery — e.

As just a simple illustration of data growth in a is electronic and mid-sized company, consider the figure on the following page that demonstrates the never meets growth of content storage in a typical organization with 1, email users.

While discovery has focused traditionally on paper documents, over the past several years ESI has become a much more important component of discovery for the simple reason that a growing proportion of corporate content is electronic and never meets paper. While email is often the most important single source of content in most organizations, there are many other content types — and locations in which it might be stored — that organizations must include among their discoverable content sources.

However, they are much less prepared to satisfy eDiscovery requirements for other types of content, particularly social media and cloud-based content repositories, as shown in the following figure. For example, nearly three-quarters of internal legal counsel considers that eDiscovery is important or extremely important to their organizations, yet only slightly by eDiscovery.

Similarly, both IT management and senior, non-IT managers place greater importance on eDiscovery than they do on their preparedness to deal with the issues presented by it.

While this process assisted review. Moreover, it contributes significantly to the growing cost of eDiscovery because of both the multiple reviews generally results of the same content that often must take place, as well as the production of content in more accurate that ultimately will not be useful.

Predictive coding generally results in more accurate coding, as well as faster document review and lower costs of eDiscovery. While predictive coding is not yet widely used, the technology was given a significant boost by a federal judge in the case of Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe et aliv. The judge in this case ordered the adoption of a protocol that includes predictive coding. The modifications represented many years of debate at various levels and had a major impact on electronic discovery within U.

Many companies have responded to these changes by improving their information management and eDiscovery practices, although many have not. As a result, decision makers need to keep in relevant mind that ESI is treated differently than paper-based data; the FRCP rules now evidence. Courts require early discussion of, and attention to, eDiscovery as an integral component of any legal action; organizations should address the inadvertent distribution of have discretion to privileged or protected materials; organizations must now focus on a two-tiered impose a variety approach to discovery in which they must first deal with reasonably accessible information and then later focus on less accessible data; and, finally, the rules can of sanctions, provide a safe harbor from sanctions by imposing a good faith requirement.

Sometimes, however, organizations have much less time than this to produce the required information. For example, in the case of Best Buy v. Developers Diversified Realtyv, the judge in the case ruled that the latter had to produce electronic content within just 28 daysvi.

Serious consequences can result from failure to preserve potentially relevant evidence. Key Issues in eDiscovery inferences, and additional costs for third parties to review or search for data, or even criminal charges. At a minimum, an organization that cannot produce data as a result of deletion may suffer a damaged corporate reputation. If the evaluation determines that certain electronic content cannot be produced because it is not reasonably accessible or it is too expensive to produce, FRCP Rule 26 b 2 B of the FRCP still requires that information about this content must be forthcoming.

This might include, for example, information describing content on backup tapes that is in a format that can no longer be read because the equipment that could access the information is no longer in use. This further implies that ESI must be preserved even if it is not reasonably accessible. For example, discoverable content will typically reside on corporate email servers, file servers, SharePoint databases and other IT-managed systems.

This ruling was made even though the judge found that there was no evidence of bad stored. Neimanix is a good example of why using backup tapes as the primary source of discoverable content is not a best practice.

The defendant argued that it should not have to produce emails that were stored on 5, backup tapes, because accessing this information would allegedly have required 14, person-hours to catalog and restore, and that an additional PST files. The defendant argued that this data was not reasonably accessible. Luckily for the defendant, the Court agreed with their position and did not require production of the data. However, a judge could easily have determined that this content should have been archived and ordered the defendants to produce the requested data.

Further, the defendant determined the search terms it would use, a decision that the plaintiffs opposed. Active Oldest Votes.

Community Bot 1 1 1 silver badge. Adrian Mouat Adrian Mouat 41k 15 15 gold badges silver badges bronze badges. I found the following helpful: jmvanel. For me it gives more complete results than xmllint.

Is there a way to ask a program to use xsi:schemaLocation instead of feeding all XSDs manually? GaborGarami Not at the moment, but it is a feature request: github. Show 5 more comments. Derek Mahar Nate Nate I tested with npp 5. Great plugin. And with version 5. FranzEbner I had this same problem. Show 7 more comments. Charles Duffy Charles Duffy k 36 36 gold badges silver badges bronze badges.

Do you know how serious the warning is about not fully supporting xml schemas? Judging by other answers xmlstarlet is a bit weak on its xsd implementation. Given xmlstarlet just uses libxml2 under the hood, it's probably easier to just use xmllint which is bundled with libxml2 and explained in the accepted answer. The content model is not determinist.

SteveC SteveC Link is not longer reachable It's reachable now - it redirects to corefiling. Online tools are a security issue. John John Pengo Pengo 1 1 gold badge 5 5 silver badges 15 15 bronze badges. Clemens Clemens 6 6 silver badges 17 17 bronze badges. Helper Helper. AaronDanielson AaronDanielson 1, 21 21 silver badges 25 25 bronze badges. This allows me to scan all the xml files picking up which xsd to use by parsing the xml.

Andrew Stern Andrew Stern 9 9 silver badges 18 18 bronze badges.